How American Academy Of Psychoanalysis And Dynamic Psychiatry allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about American Academy Of Psychoanalysis And Dynamic Psychiatry
Is American Academy Of Psychoanalysis And Dynamic Psychiatry a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, American Academy Of Psychoanalysis And Dynamic Psychiatry (EIN: 131854603) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 3 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is American Academy Of Psychoanalysis And Dynamic Psychiatry a good charity to donate to?
American Academy Of Psychoanalysis And Dynamic Psychiatry has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $169K. Assets: $1.2M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for American Academy Of Psychoanalysis And Dynamic Psychiatry?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for American Academy Of Psychoanalysis And Dynamic Psychiatry is 131854603. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does American Academy Of Psychoanalysis And Dynamic Psychiatry spend its money?
American Academy Of Psychoanalysis And Dynamic Psychiatry allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify American Academy Of Psychoanalysis And Dynamic Psychiatry's tax-exempt status?
You can verify American Academy Of Psychoanalysis And Dynamic Psychiatry's tax-exempt status using EIN 131854603 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The American Academy Of Psychoanalysis And Dynamic Psychiatry demonstrates consistent financial stability with substantial assets relative to its annual revenue. For instance, in 2023, with revenue of $203,027, the organization held assets of $1,086,069, indicating a strong reserve. However, the organization has frequently operated at a deficit, with expenses exceeding revenue in most recent years (e.g., 2023 expenses of $283,490 against $203,027 revenue, and 2022 expenses of $195,020 against $132,138 revenue). This trend suggests reliance on its asset base or prior surpluses to cover operational costs.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, which is not provided in the summary data. However, the consistent lack of reported officer compensation across all filings suggests a lean operational structure at the executive level, which can be a positive indicator of efficiency. The organization's liabilities have consistently been reported as zero or negligible, indicating sound financial management in terms of debt.
Transparency regarding executive compensation is excellent, with 0% reported officer compensation across all available filings. However, the absence of detailed expense breakdowns (program vs. admin vs. fundraising) in the provided data limits a comprehensive assessment of spending efficiency and how effectively donor funds are directly applied to mission-related activities. The consistent filing of IRS Form 990s over 13 periods demonstrates a commitment to regulatory compliance and basic financial transparency.