Quick charity verification for American Legion Auxiliary (EIN: 16018585)
Verdict: American Legion Auxiliary shows mixed signals
60/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
2Red Flags
1Strengths
Red Flags
Lack of recent IRS 990 filings (latest is 2012)
Extremely low reported revenue and assets, suggesting minimal operational scale or potential inactivity
Strengths
No reported officer compensation, indicating a volunteer-driven model for the reported period
Spending Breakdown
How American Legion Auxiliary allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
100%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
0%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about American Legion Auxiliary
Is American Legion Auxiliary a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, American Legion Auxiliary (EIN: 16018585) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 60/100. 2 red flags identified, 1 strength noted.
Is American Legion Auxiliary a good charity to donate to?
American Legion Auxiliary has a Mission Score of 60/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for American Legion Auxiliary?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for American Legion Auxiliary is 16018585. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does American Legion Auxiliary spend its money?
American Legion Auxiliary allocates 100% to programs, 0% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify American Legion Auxiliary's tax-exempt status?
You can verify American Legion Auxiliary's tax-exempt status using EIN 16018585 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The American Legion Auxiliary in Fort Kent, ME, appears to be a very small, local chapter with minimal financial activity based on its single available IRS 990 filing from 2012. With reported revenue of only $18 and assets of $18, its financial health is extremely limited, suggesting it operates on a micro-scale, likely relying on volunteer efforts and small community contributions. The filing indicates no expenses were reported, which could imply all activities are unfunded or expenses are covered by a larger parent organization, or simply that the financial activity was negligible in that period. Given the scale, assessing spending efficiency in a traditional sense is difficult, as there's no significant spending to analyze. Transparency is limited by the lack of recent filings and the minimal data in the single available filing, making it challenging to get a comprehensive view of its operations.