Quick charity verification for Bauman Family Foundation (EIN: 133119290)
Verdict: Bauman Family Foundation appears trustworthy
85/100Mission Score
$5.8MRevenue
$10.8MAssets
2Red Flags
4Strengths
Red Flags
Lack of detailed expense breakdown (program, admin, fundraising) in provided data
NTEE code is unknown, limiting understanding of mission area
Strengths
Consistent zero officer compensation
Very low liabilities across all periods
Clear strategy of asset distribution for mission fulfillment
Significant historical asset base for philanthropic activity
Spending Breakdown
How Bauman Family Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Bauman Family Foundation
Is Bauman Family Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Bauman Family Foundation (EIN: 133119290) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Bauman Family Foundation a good charity to donate to?
Bauman Family Foundation has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $5.8M. Assets: $10.8M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Bauman Family Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Bauman Family Foundation is 133119290. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Bauman Family Foundation spend its money?
Bauman Family Foundation allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Bauman Family Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Bauman Family Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 133119290 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Bauman Family Foundation exhibits a consistent pattern of spending significantly more than its annual revenue, drawing down its assets over time. For instance, in the 202406 period, the foundation reported revenue of $1,074,127 against expenses of $9,879,764, leading to a substantial deficit. This operational model, typical for a private foundation distributing its endowment, has resulted in a decrease in assets from $88,417,486 in 2012 to $11,590,616 in 2024. The foundation consistently reports zero officer compensation, which is a positive indicator of resource allocation towards its mission rather than administrative overhead related to executive salaries. However, without a detailed breakdown of expenses into program, administrative, and fundraising categories, it's challenging to fully assess spending efficiency beyond the overall revenue-to-expense ratio.
The foundation's financial health, while showing a significant reduction in assets, appears to be a deliberate strategy of asset distribution rather than financial distress, given its consistent operational deficits. The low liabilities across all reported periods (often $1 or $0) suggest a healthy balance sheet in terms of debt. The lack of officer compensation enhances transparency regarding executive pay, but the absence of NTEE code and detailed expense breakdowns limits a comprehensive assessment of its programmatic focus and efficiency. Further transparency on how the substantial expenses are categorized would provide a clearer picture of its spending efficiency and impact.