Low liabilities relative to assets, demonstrating good financial management.
Expenses generally managed to maintain solvency despite revenue fluctuations.
Spending Breakdown
How Communication Workers Of America allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Communication Workers Of America
Is Communication Workers Of America a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Communication Workers Of America (EIN: 135276340) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Communication Workers Of America a good charity to donate to?
Communication Workers Of America has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $1.4M. Assets: $2.0M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Communication Workers Of America?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Communication Workers Of America is 135276340. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Communication Workers Of America spend its money?
Communication Workers Of America allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Communication Workers Of America's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Communication Workers Of America's tax-exempt status using EIN 135276340 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Communication Workers Of America demonstrates consistent financial stability with assets generally exceeding $2 million, as seen in the latest filing with $2,060,864 in assets. While revenue has fluctuated, for example, dropping from $727,384 in 2020 to $278,994 in 2024, the organization has managed its expenses to maintain a healthy asset base. The organization consistently reports 0% officer compensation, which indicates a high degree of transparency regarding executive pay and a potential reliance on volunteer leadership or compensation structured outside of traditional officer salaries. This practice, while not explicitly detailing all compensation, suggests a commitment to directing funds towards its mission rather than high administrative overhead. The organization's liabilities have remained relatively low compared to its assets, indicating good financial management and solvency.