How Eastern Montana Humane Society Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Eastern Montana Humane Society Inc
Is Eastern Montana Humane Society Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Eastern Montana Humane Society Inc (EIN: 202382772) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 45/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Eastern Montana Humane Society Inc a good charity to donate to?
Eastern Montana Humane Society Inc has a Mission Score of 45/100. Revenue: $2K. Assets: $10K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Eastern Montana Humane Society Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Eastern Montana Humane Society Inc is 202382772. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Eastern Montana Humane Society Inc spend its money?
Eastern Montana Humane Society Inc allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Eastern Montana Humane Society Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Eastern Montana Humane Society Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 202382772 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Eastern Montana Humane Society Inc operates on a very small scale, with recent annual revenues consistently below $2,000, and as low as $0 in 2020. This indicates a limited capacity for significant program delivery. The organization's expenses have frequently exceeded its revenue, as seen in 2023 ($1,311 expenses vs. $1,030 revenue) and 2022 ($950 expenses vs. $702 revenue), leading to a gradual decline in assets from $13,207 in 2014 to $10,360 currently. While the organization consistently reports zero liabilities, which is a positive sign of fiscal responsibility, its financial stability appears precarious given the consistent operating deficits.
The organization's transparency is high in terms of financial reporting, with 13 filings available and consistent reporting of zero officer compensation, suggesting a volunteer-driven model. However, the extremely low revenue and asset base raise questions about the actual impact and scope of its operations. Without more detailed functional expense breakdowns, it's challenging to fully assess spending efficiency beyond the overall deficit spending.