Manageable liabilities relative to assets, suggesting good debt management.
Spending Breakdown
How Fort Kent Golf Club allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Fort Kent Golf Club
Is Fort Kent Golf Club a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Fort Kent Golf Club (EIN: 10281420) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Fort Kent Golf Club a good charity to donate to?
Fort Kent Golf Club has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $352K. Assets: $225K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Fort Kent Golf Club?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Fort Kent Golf Club is 10281420. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Fort Kent Golf Club spend its money?
Fort Kent Golf Club allocates 85% to programs, 15% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Fort Kent Golf Club's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Fort Kent Golf Club's tax-exempt status using EIN 10281420 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Fort Kent Golf Club demonstrates consistent financial activity over the past decade, with revenues and expenses generally in a similar range, typically between $150,000 and $250,000 annually. In the most recent filing (202312), the organization reported expenses of $259,535 exceeding revenues of $239,556, resulting in a deficit for the year. This trend of expenses occasionally surpassing revenue is observed in several periods, such as 2023, 2020, 2019, 2018, and 2014, indicating that the club sometimes operates at a slight loss. However, the organization maintains a stable asset base, with assets consistently above $180,000 and liabilities generally manageable, suggesting overall financial stability despite year-to-year fluctuations in operating results.
Regarding spending efficiency, without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, it's challenging to provide a precise assessment. However, the consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings suggests a lean operational structure at the executive level, which is a positive indicator for efficiency. The club's primary function appears to be maintaining a golf course, and the expenses likely reflect operational costs associated with this purpose. The absence of officer compensation also points to a volunteer-driven leadership, which can contribute to lower administrative overhead.
Transparency is generally good, with 13 years of consistent IRS 990 filings available. The consistent reporting of key financial metrics allows for a clear historical view of the organization's financial health. The lack of reported officer compensation enhances transparency by showing that leadership is not drawing salaries from the organization. However, the NTEE code being unknown and the absence of a detailed functional expense breakdown in the provided data limit a deeper analysis of program efficiency and specific spending categories.