Spending Breakdown
How Frankel Family Foundation Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
AI Transparency Report
The Frankel Family Foundation Inc. exhibits a highly volatile financial history, with significant fluctuations in revenue and expenses over the past decade. Notably, the organization reported negative revenues in several years (e.g., -$7,363,095 in 2021 and -$9,886,011 in 2020), which could indicate substantial investment losses or significant asset revaluations rather than operational deficits. Despite these revenue swings, expenses have remained relatively consistent, ranging from approximately $700,000 to $2,000,000 annually. The foundation's assets have also seen considerable changes, peaking at over $22 million in 2019 before declining to $517,800 in 2023. The consistent reporting of zero officer compensation across all filings suggests a volunteer-led or very lean executive structure, which can be a positive indicator of efficiency, though it warrants further investigation into how the organization is managed.
Given the nature of a private foundation (NTEE Code T20), the primary 'program' activity is typically grantmaking. Without a detailed breakdown of expenses beyond total expenses, it's challenging to precisely assess spending efficiency in terms of program delivery versus administrative or fundraising costs. However, the absence of officer compensation is a strong positive for transparency and efficiency. The dramatic shifts in assets and revenue, particularly the negative revenue figures, suggest a reliance on investment income and potentially significant market exposure, which introduces a higher degree of financial risk and makes consistent financial health harder to ascertain. The organization's liabilities have consistently been very low, often reported as $1, which is a positive sign of financial stability in that regard.
Overall, the foundation appears to be a grant-making entity with a lean operational structure, as evidenced by zero officer compensation. However, the extreme volatility in revenue and assets, particularly the large negative revenue figures, raises questions about the source and stability of its funding and investment strategies. While transparency regarding executive pay is excellent, a deeper dive into the nature of the negative revenues and the allocation of expenses would be necessary for a complete financial health assessment. The current asset base of $517,800 against expenses of $1,106,521 in 2023 indicates that the foundation is spending down its assets or relying heavily on new contributions to cover its grantmaking and operational costs.