Expenses consistently lower than revenue in most periods, leading to healthy surpluses
Strong financial stability with a robust asset base
Spending Breakdown
How Independent Order Of Odd Fellows allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Independent Order Of Odd Fellows
Is Independent Order Of Odd Fellows a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Independent Order Of Odd Fellows (EIN: 16012710) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is Independent Order Of Odd Fellows a good charity to donate to?
Independent Order Of Odd Fellows has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $2.7M. Assets: $4.9M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Independent Order Of Odd Fellows?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Independent Order Of Odd Fellows is 16012710. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Independent Order Of Odd Fellows spend its money?
Independent Order Of Odd Fellows allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Independent Order Of Odd Fellows's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Independent Order Of Odd Fellows's tax-exempt status using EIN 16012710 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Independent Order Of Odd Fellows demonstrates consistent financial stability, with assets growing from $3,215,455 in 2015 to $4,615,934 in 2023. The organization consistently reports zero liabilities, indicating a very strong balance sheet and low financial risk. Revenue has fluctuated, with a notable peak of $505,863 in 2020 and $442,792 in 2023, while expenses have remained relatively controlled, typically ranging between $140,000 and $220,000 annually. This suggests efficient management of resources relative to their operational scale.
However, a significant area for improvement in transparency is the lack of detailed expense breakdowns in the provided data. Without knowing the allocation of expenses between program services, administrative costs, and fundraising, it's challenging to fully assess spending efficiency. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation is a positive indicator for resource allocation, suggesting that leadership is either volunteer-based or compensated through other means not captured in this specific metric, which could be further clarified for complete transparency. The NTEE code being unknown also limits understanding of their specific programmatic focus.
Overall, the organization appears financially sound with a healthy asset base and no reported debt. To enhance transparency and allow for a more thorough financial health assessment, providing a detailed breakdown of expenses and clarifying the nature of officer compensation would be beneficial. The consistent growth in assets over nearly a decade, despite varying revenue, points to prudent financial stewardship.