Quick charity verification for Minnesota Center For Health Care Ethics (EIN: 134236053)
Verdict: Minnesota Center For Health Care Ethics appears trustworthy
70/100Mission Score
$368KRevenue
$102KAssets
3Red Flags
3Strengths
Red Flags
Recurring operational deficits (e.g., 202312: $217,558 revenue vs. $334,287 expenses)
Significant decline in assets from $516,247 (202012) to $29,163 (202312)
Expenses consistently exceeding revenue in recent years (e.g., 202212, 202112, 202312)
Strengths
0% officer compensation reported across all filings, indicating efficient use of funds for mission.
Consistent program focus with no reported fundraising expenses, suggesting direct mission-related spending.
Long operational history with 13 filings, indicating established presence.
Spending Breakdown
How Minnesota Center For Health Care Ethics allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Minnesota Center For Health Care Ethics
Is Minnesota Center For Health Care Ethics a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Minnesota Center For Health Care Ethics (EIN: 134236053) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Minnesota Center For Health Care Ethics a good charity to donate to?
Minnesota Center For Health Care Ethics has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $368K. Assets: $102K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Minnesota Center For Health Care Ethics?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Minnesota Center For Health Care Ethics is 134236053. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Minnesota Center For Health Care Ethics spend its money?
Minnesota Center For Health Care Ethics allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Minnesota Center For Health Care Ethics's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Minnesota Center For Health Care Ethics's tax-exempt status using EIN 134236053 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Minnesota Center For Health Care Ethics demonstrates a consistent commitment to its mission, as evidenced by its program spending. In the most recent filing (202312), the organization reported expenses of $334,287 against revenues of $217,558, indicating a deficit for the period. This trend of expenses exceeding revenue has been observed in several recent years, including 202212 ($341,436 expenses vs. $159,404 revenue) and 202112 ($341,734 expenses vs. $155,138 revenue). While the organization has maintained a relatively stable level of expenses, its revenue has fluctuated significantly, leading to a decline in assets from a high of $516,247 in 202012 to $29,163 in 202312. The organization's transparency is strong regarding executive compensation, reporting 0% officer compensation across all available filings, which is a positive indicator of resource allocation directly to its mission.
The organization's spending efficiency, particularly its program spending, appears to be a strength, as it does not report any officer compensation, suggesting that resources are not being diverted to high executive salaries. However, the consistent operational deficits in recent years raise questions about long-term financial sustainability if revenue trends do not improve. The significant decrease in assets over the past few years, from over half a million dollars to less than $30,000, is a notable concern that warrants further investigation into the funding model and expenditure management.
Overall, the Minnesota Center For Health Care Ethics exhibits good transparency regarding compensation and a clear focus on its mission through its spending patterns. However, its financial health is challenged by recurring deficits and a substantial depletion of assets, which could impact its future capacity to deliver programs. A strategic review of fundraising and financial management would be beneficial to ensure the organization's continued viability.