Strong program spending focus due to minimal administrative overhead.
Spending Breakdown
How Monadnock Marauders Football Club Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Monadnock Marauders Football Club Inc
Is Monadnock Marauders Football Club Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Monadnock Marauders Football Club Inc (EIN: 20597152) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 90/100. 0 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Monadnock Marauders Football Club Inc a good charity to donate to?
Monadnock Marauders Football Club Inc has a Mission Score of 90/100. Revenue: $27K. Assets: $14K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Monadnock Marauders Football Club Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Monadnock Marauders Football Club Inc is 20597152. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Monadnock Marauders Football Club Inc spend its money?
Monadnock Marauders Football Club Inc allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Monadnock Marauders Football Club Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Monadnock Marauders Football Club Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 20597152 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Monadnock Marauders Football Club Inc appears to be a small, community-focused organization with limited financial activity. In its latest reported period (201806), the organization generated $26,436 in revenue and incurred $13,397 in expenses, resulting in a surplus. Its assets stood at $14,405 with minimal liabilities of $850, indicating a healthy balance sheet for its size. The organization's financial health seems stable, operating within its means and maintaining a positive net asset position.
The spending efficiency is commendable, with a significant portion of its expenses likely directed towards its programs, given the zero reported officer compensation. This suggests a volunteer-driven or very lean operational model, which is efficient for a small nonprofit. The lack of reported officer compensation also points to a high degree of financial transparency regarding executive pay.
Overall, the organization demonstrates sound financial management for its scale. Its modest revenue and asset base are typical for a local sports club, and the financial data suggests responsible stewardship of funds. The absence of significant liabilities further reinforces its stable financial standing.