Is Natural Resource Education Center At Moosehead Legit?
Quick charity verification for Natural Resource Education Center At Moosehead (EIN: 10505918)
Verdict: Natural Resource Education Center At Moosehead appears trustworthy
85/100Mission Score
$81KRevenue
$415KAssets
2Red Flags
4Strengths
Red Flags
Exact matching of assets and liabilities in recent filings (e.g., 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019) which is unusual and requires further clarification.
Significant fluctuations in annual revenue, from $395,216 in 2020 to $76,311 in 2024, which could indicate reliance on sporadic large grants or donations.
Strengths
Consistent positive net income, with expenses generally well below revenue (e.g., 2024 revenue $76,311 vs. expenses $60,824).
0% reported officer compensation across all available filings, indicating high efficiency and likely volunteer leadership.
Significant growth in assets over the past decade, from $149,147 in 2015 to $472,314 in 2024.
Maintains a healthy financial reserve, as evidenced by growing assets.
Spending Breakdown
How Natural Resource Education Center At Moosehead allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Natural Resource Education Center At Moosehead
Is Natural Resource Education Center At Moosehead a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Natural Resource Education Center At Moosehead (EIN: 10505918) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Natural Resource Education Center At Moosehead a good charity to donate to?
Natural Resource Education Center At Moosehead has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $81K. Assets: $415K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Natural Resource Education Center At Moosehead?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Natural Resource Education Center At Moosehead is 10505918. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Natural Resource Education Center At Moosehead spend its money?
Natural Resource Education Center At Moosehead allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Natural Resource Education Center At Moosehead's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Natural Resource Education Center At Moosehead's tax-exempt status using EIN 10505918 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Natural Resource Education Center At Moosehead demonstrates generally sound financial health, maintaining positive net assets over the past several years. While revenue has fluctuated significantly, from a high of $395,216 in 2020 to $76,311 in 2024, the organization consistently manages to keep expenses below revenue, indicating fiscal prudence. For instance, in 2024, revenue was $76,311 against expenses of $60,824, resulting in a surplus. The organization's assets have grown substantially over time, from $149,147 in 2015 to $472,314 in 2024, suggesting effective asset management and growth.
Spending efficiency appears strong, particularly given the consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings, which indicates that leadership is either volunteer-based or compensated through other means not categorized as officer compensation. This contributes to a higher proportion of funds potentially being directed towards programs. However, the filings do not provide a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, which limits a precise assessment of spending efficiency ratios. The consistent reporting of liabilities matching assets in recent years (e.g., $472,314 assets and $472,314 liabilities in 2024) is unusual and warrants further investigation to understand the nature of these liabilities and their impact on the organization's financial flexibility.
Transparency regarding executive compensation is excellent, with a clear 0% reported for officer compensation. However, the lack of detailed functional expense breakdowns in the provided data limits a full assessment of how funds are allocated between programs, administration, and fundraising. While the overall financial picture suggests responsible management, the identical asset and liability figures in recent years could be a reporting anomaly or indicate specific financial structures that are not immediately clear from the summary data.