How New Hampshire Congress Of Parents And Teachers allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
0%
Program Spending
Concerning — less than half to programs
100%
Admin Costs
High — over 25% on administration
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about New Hampshire Congress Of Parents And Teachers
Is New Hampshire Congress Of Parents And Teachers a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, New Hampshire Congress Of Parents And Teachers (EIN: 20483226) has notable concerns. Mission Score: 20/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is New Hampshire Congress Of Parents And Teachers a good charity to donate to?
New Hampshire Congress Of Parents And Teachers has a Mission Score of 20/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for New Hampshire Congress Of Parents And Teachers?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for New Hampshire Congress Of Parents And Teachers is 20483226. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does New Hampshire Congress Of Parents And Teachers spend its money?
New Hampshire Congress Of Parents And Teachers allocates 0% to programs, 100% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify New Hampshire Congress Of Parents And Teachers's tax-exempt status?
You can verify New Hampshire Congress Of Parents And Teachers's tax-exempt status using EIN 20483226 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The New Hampshire Congress Of Parents And Teachers appears to be a very small organization, or potentially inactive, based on its latest available IRS 990 data. For the period ending July 2011, the organization reported no revenue and minimal expenses of $795. Its assets were $1,500 with no liabilities. This financial snapshot suggests an organization with extremely limited financial activity and resources.
Given the lack of revenue and minimal expenses, assessing spending efficiency is challenging. The organization did not report any officer compensation, which is positive for transparency regarding executive pay. However, the absence of more recent financial data (the latest filing is from 2011) significantly limits the ability to provide a current assessment of its financial health or operational transparency. Without more recent filings, it's difficult to determine if the organization is still active or effectively pursuing its mission.