Consistent operational activity over multiple years, demonstrating sustained service.
Spending Breakdown
How Port Huron Mercy Family Care allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Port Huron Mercy Family Care
Is Port Huron Mercy Family Care a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Port Huron Mercy Family Care (EIN: 201855647) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Port Huron Mercy Family Care a good charity to donate to?
Port Huron Mercy Family Care has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Port Huron Mercy Family Care?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Port Huron Mercy Family Care is 201855647. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Port Huron Mercy Family Care spend its money?
Port Huron Mercy Family Care allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Port Huron Mercy Family Care's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Port Huron Mercy Family Care's tax-exempt status using EIN 201855647 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Port Huron Mercy Family Care appears to be a financially stable organization, consistently operating with revenues closely matching expenses over the past five years. For instance, in 2015, revenues were $1,886,138 against expenses of $1,993,446, indicating a slight deficit but within a reasonable range for operational fluctuations. The organization has maintained a healthy asset-to-liability ratio, with assets consistently exceeding liabilities, such as $296,015 in assets versus $149,900 in liabilities in 2015, suggesting good financial management and solvency.
However, without detailed breakdowns of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, it's challenging to fully assess spending efficiency. The consistent 'Officer Comp=0%' across all filings is notable, indicating either no paid officers or that compensation is reported differently, which could impact transparency if key leadership is compensated through other means not reflected in this specific line item. Further information on the allocation of expenses would be beneficial for a complete understanding of their operational efficiency and program focus.