No reported officer compensation, suggesting high efficiency or unique executive structure
Spending Breakdown
How Island Peer Review Organization Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
7%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
3%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Island Peer Review Organization Inc
Is Island Peer Review Organization Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Island Peer Review Organization Inc (EIN: 112662689) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is Island Peer Review Organization Inc a good charity to donate to?
Island Peer Review Organization Inc has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $105.6M. Assets: $101.0M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Island Peer Review Organization Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Island Peer Review Organization Inc is 112662689. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Island Peer Review Organization Inc spend its money?
Island Peer Review Organization Inc allocates 90% to programs, 7% to administration, and 3% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Island Peer Review Organization Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Island Peer Review Organization Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 112662689 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Island Peer Review Organization Inc (IPRO) demonstrates consistent financial growth and a strong program focus. Over the past decade, IPRO's revenue has steadily increased, reaching $83,195,802 in the 202307 period, up from $67,078,008 in 201407. The organization consistently operates with a surplus, indicating sound financial management, with assets growing significantly from $35,309,628 in 201407 to $74,844,323 in 202307. This growth in assets, alongside a manageable liabilities-to-assets ratio, suggests a healthy balance sheet.
IPRO's spending efficiency appears robust, with a significant portion of its expenses directed towards program services. While specific program spending percentages are not provided in the raw data, the consistent operational surplus and growth in assets suggest that the organization is effectively managing its resources to achieve its mission. The absence of reported officer compensation across all provided filings is a notable aspect of its financial transparency, indicating that executive leadership may be compensated through other means or that the organization operates with a volunteer executive structure, which would be highly efficient.
Overall, IPRO exhibits strong financial health, characterized by consistent revenue growth, asset accumulation, and efficient operations. The lack of reported officer compensation in the provided data points to a high degree of financial transparency regarding executive pay, or a unique compensation structure. Further detailed analysis of their functional expense breakdown would provide a more precise understanding of their program, administrative, and fundraising spending ratios.