Significant financial instability indicated by the sharp decline in both assets and revenue.
Lack of detailed expense breakdown for the latest period prevents a current assessment of spending efficiency.
Strengths
Historically, the organization managed significant operational budgets, often exceeding $16 million annually.
Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation, if accurate, suggests a commitment to directing funds away from executive salaries.
Spending Breakdown
How Staten Island Mental Health Society Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Staten Island Mental Health Society Inc
Is Staten Island Mental Health Society Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Staten Island Mental Health Society Inc (EIN: 135623279) has notable concerns. Mission Score: 30/100. 5 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Staten Island Mental Health Society Inc a good charity to donate to?
Staten Island Mental Health Society Inc has a Mission Score of 30/100. Revenue: $7.2M. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Staten Island Mental Health Society Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Staten Island Mental Health Society Inc is 135623279. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Staten Island Mental Health Society Inc spend its money?
Staten Island Mental Health Society Inc allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Staten Island Mental Health Society Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Staten Island Mental Health Society Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 135623279 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Staten Island Mental Health Society Inc. exhibits a concerning financial trend, with its latest reported revenue of $7,247,855 representing a significant decline from its historical average of over $17 million. While the provided data does not include detailed expense breakdowns for the latest period, historical filings show expenses often exceeding revenue, such as in 201806 where expenses were $17,694,884 against $17,253,642 in revenue. The organization's assets have also decreased from a high of $16,207,072 in 201106 to $0 in the latest report, which is a critical red flag requiring further investigation into the disposition of these assets and the organization's current operational capacity.
The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all historical filings suggests either a fully volunteer-led executive team or that compensation is reported under different categories, which could impact transparency. The lack of detailed expense allocation (program, admin, fundraising) in the provided data for the latest period makes a precise assessment of spending efficiency challenging. However, the dramatic drop in revenue and complete depletion of assets raise serious questions about the organization's financial stability and long-term viability, regardless of historical spending ratios.
Given the significant financial changes, including the reported $0 in assets and the substantial drop in revenue, the organization's current financial health appears precarious. Without more recent detailed expense data, it's difficult to fully assess spending efficiency, but the overall financial trajectory indicates a need for immediate and thorough scrutiny. The consistent 0% officer compensation, while potentially positive for resource allocation, also warrants clarification to ensure full transparency regarding executive leadership costs.