Is Steamfitters Industry Security Benefit Fund Legit?

Quick charity verification for Steamfitters Industry Security Benefit Fund (EIN: 136149681)

Verdict: Steamfitters Industry Security Benefit Fund appears trustworthy

85/100Mission Score
$70.2MRevenue
$319.0MAssets
1Red Flags
3Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

AI Transparency Report

The Steamfitters Industry Security Benefit Fund, classified under NTEE J40 (Employee & Member Welfare Organizations), demonstrates a consistent financial pattern over the past decade. The organization's primary function appears to be managing benefits, as indicated by its NTEE code and the absence of reported officer compensation, suggesting a focus on member services rather than traditional programmatic spending or fundraising. Its assets have grown significantly, from $209 million in 2014 to $306 million in 2023, indicating sound asset management. However, the organization has experienced periods where expenses exceeded revenue, notably in 2023 ($50M expenses vs. $47.5M revenue), 2022 ($55.2M expenses vs. $45M revenue), 2021 ($52.3M expenses vs. $52.2M revenue), and 2020 ($68.7M expenses vs. $46.6M revenue). This suggests that the fund may draw from its asset base to cover benefit payouts during certain periods, which is not uncommon for benefit funds but warrants monitoring for long-term sustainability. The absence of officer compensation across all reported periods is a significant indicator of transparency and efficiency, as it suggests that the fund's administration is either volunteer-based or compensated through other means not reported as officer compensation on the 990, or that the fund's structure does not involve traditional 'officers' in a compensated capacity. Given its nature as a benefit fund, its 'program spending' would largely be the benefits paid out to members. Without a detailed breakdown of expenses into program, administrative, and fundraising categories in the provided data, a precise spending efficiency ratio is difficult to calculate. However, the consistent growth in assets alongside fluctuating revenue and expenses suggests a well-managed, albeit sometimes deficit-spending, benefit fund. Overall, the organization appears to be financially stable with substantial assets. The lack of officer compensation is a positive transparency signal. The periods of expenses exceeding revenue are a point to observe, but for a benefit fund, this can be part of its operational model, drawing from reserves to meet obligations. Further detailed expense breakdowns would be needed for a more granular assessment of spending efficiency.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages