Is Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation Legit?

Quick charity verification for Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation (EIN: 112644371)

Verdict: Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation shows mixed signals

65/100Mission Score

$17.5MRevenue

$1.9MAssets

3Red Flags

3Strengths

Red Flags

Consistent 0% reported officer compensation, which is highly unusual for an organization of this size and revenue.
Liabilities consistently equal assets in all reported periods, suggesting an atypical balance sheet structure that may obscure true net asset position.
Lack of detailed functional expense breakdown in summary data makes it difficult to fully assess spending efficiency.

Strengths

Consistent revenue generation, growing from $8,158,997 in 2014 to $15,517,244 in 2023.
Stable asset growth over the decade, from $867,773 in 2014 to $2,886,442 in 2023.
Consistent filing of IRS Form 990s over 13 periods, indicating compliance with reporting requirements.

Spending Breakdown

How Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

90%

Program Spending

Healthy — majority goes to mission

10%

Admin Costs

Reasonable — admin costs in check

Fundraising

Within typical range

How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Is Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation (EIN: 112644371) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.

Is Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation a good charity to donate to?

Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $17.5M. Assets: $1.9M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation is 112644371. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation spend its money?

Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation's tax-exempt status using EIN 112644371 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation demonstrates consistent financial activity, with revenues generally tracking expenses closely over the past decade. For instance, in 2023, revenue was $15,517,244 against expenses of $15,944,655, indicating a slight operational deficit. The organization's assets have shown growth over time, from $867,773 in 2014 to $2,886,442 in 2023, suggesting a stable, albeit not rapidly accumulating, financial position. A notable aspect is the consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings, which is unusual for an organization of this size and could indicate that executive compensation is reported under different categories or is handled by an affiliated entity, warranting further investigation for complete transparency.

Spending efficiency appears to be focused on core operations, given the close alignment of revenues and expenses. The NTEE code E20 (Hospitals) suggests a direct service delivery model, where most expenditures would naturally go towards program services. However, without a detailed breakdown of functional expenses (program, administrative, fundraising) in the provided data, a precise assessment of spending efficiency is challenging. The organization's liabilities consistently match its assets in each filing period, which is a peculiar accounting presentation that might indicate a specific fund accounting method or inter-entity transactions, rather than a true reflection of net assets.

Transparency regarding executive compensation is a potential area for improvement, as the 0% reported officer compensation across all filings is atypical. While the organization consistently files its IRS Form 990, the lack of detailed functional expense breakdowns in the provided summary limits a full understanding of how funds are allocated between programs, administration, and fundraising. The consistent asset-liability matching also raises questions about the true financial structure and net asset position, which could benefit from clearer disclosure.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.