Is Usta National Tennis Center Inc Legit?

Quick charity verification for Usta National Tennis Center Inc (EIN: 132946690)

Verdict: Usta National Tennis Center Inc appears trustworthy

70/100Mission Score
$141.8MRevenue
$656.3MAssets
4Red Flags
3Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

AI Transparency Report

USTA National Tennis Center Inc. demonstrates a fluctuating financial health over the past decade, with significant revenue volatility, particularly a sharp drop in 2020 to $6.6 million from over $100 million in prior years, followed by a strong recovery to $140.7 million in 2023. The organization consistently reports expenses exceeding revenue in most years, indicating a reliance on other funding sources or drawing down reserves, though 2023 showed a positive operating margin with $140.7 million in revenue against $130.1 million in expenses. The organization's assets have generally decreased from a peak of $819.9 million in 2018 to $631.8 million in 2023, while liabilities have remained substantial, often exceeding assets in recent years, suggesting a potentially leveraged financial position. Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed functional expense breakdown, which is not provided in the summary data. However, the consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings suggests a commitment to minimizing administrative overhead in that specific area. The organization's transparency appears high regarding executive compensation, as it consistently reports no officer compensation, which is a clear and easily verifiable fact from the filings. However, a more granular breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses would enhance the overall transparency and allow for a more precise evaluation of spending efficiency. Overall, while the organization has shown resilience in revenue recovery post-2020, its long-term financial sustainability warrants closer examination due to the historical trend of expenses exceeding revenue and a high liability-to-asset ratio. The lack of reported officer compensation is a positive indicator for administrative cost control, but a complete picture of spending efficiency requires more detailed expense categorization.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages