Quick charity verification for 101010 (EIN: 200332081)
Verdict: 101010 has notable concerns
30/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
3Red Flags
1Strengths
Red Flags
Latest filing shows $0 revenue and assets, indicating a potential cessation of operations or significant financial distress.
Significant deficit in 2017, with expenses ($526,105) far exceeding revenue ($303,412).
Inconsistent financial performance with highly fluctuating revenue and expenses over the years.
Strengths
Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings.
Spending Breakdown
How 101010 allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
0%
Program Spending
Concerning — less than half to programs
0%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about 101010
Is 101010 a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, 101010 (EIN: 200332081) has notable concerns. Mission Score: 30/100. 3 red flags identified, 1 strength noted.
Is 101010 a good charity to donate to?
101010 has a Mission Score of 30/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for 101010?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for 101010 is 200332081. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does 101010 spend its money?
101010 allocates 0% to programs, 0% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify 101010's tax-exempt status?
You can verify 101010's tax-exempt status using EIN 200332081 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
This organization, 101010, exhibits inconsistent financial activity over its filing history. While it reported significant revenue in 2016 ($477,350) and 2017 ($303,412), its latest filing shows $0 in revenue and assets, which is a concerning drop-off. The organization's expenses have fluctuated, with a notable deficit in 2017 where expenses ($526,105) significantly outstripped revenue ($303,412). The lack of detailed expense breakdowns in the provided data makes it difficult to assess spending efficiency, but the overall financial stability appears volatile.
The organization's transparency regarding executive compensation is positive, consistently reporting 0% officer compensation across all available filings. However, the sudden cessation of financial activity in the latest period, indicated by $0 revenue and assets, raises questions about its current operational status and future viability. Without more recent detailed filings, it's challenging to fully understand the reasons behind this significant change and its implications for the organization's mission.
Given the dramatic shift to zero revenue and assets in the latest period, and the absence of detailed program spending information, a comprehensive assessment of its financial health and program effectiveness is limited. The historical data shows periods of both growth and significant deficits, suggesting an unpredictable financial trajectory.