Consistently low liabilities ($1 in most recent years) demonstrates sound financial management.
Stable asset base, despite some decline, indicates long-term financial planning for a private foundation.
Consistent annual IRS 990 filings demonstrate good transparency.
Spending Breakdown
How A H Gage Private Foundation Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about A H Gage Private Foundation Inc
Is A H Gage Private Foundation Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, A H Gage Private Foundation Inc (EIN: 205276597) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is A H Gage Private Foundation Inc a good charity to donate to?
A H Gage Private Foundation Inc has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $697K. Assets: $756K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for A H Gage Private Foundation Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for A H Gage Private Foundation Inc is 205276597. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does A H Gage Private Foundation Inc spend its money?
A H Gage Private Foundation Inc allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify A H Gage Private Foundation Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify A H Gage Private Foundation Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 205276597 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
A H Gage Private Foundation Inc operates as a grant-making private foundation, as indicated by its NTEE code T22. Its financial health appears stable, with assets consistently in the high six figures to low seven figures over the past decade, currently at $767,863 as of 2023. However, the foundation has consistently spent more than it has brought in through revenue in most recent years, with expenses of $60,484 against revenue of $28,754 in 2023, and $61,729 against $2,071 in 2022. This trend suggests it is primarily drawing from its asset base to fund its activities, which is typical for a private foundation but warrants monitoring to ensure long-term sustainability.
The organization demonstrates strong spending efficiency in terms of administrative and fundraising costs, as it reports 0% officer compensation across all available filings, implying minimal overhead in this area. Given its nature as a private foundation, its 'program' spending would primarily be grants made to other organizations. The consistent deficit spending, where expenses exceed revenue, is a characteristic of foundations distributing their endowment, but the specific breakdown of these expenses (grants vs. operational costs) would provide a clearer picture of its programmatic efficiency. The consistent reporting of minimal liabilities ($1 in most recent years) indicates sound financial management regarding debt.
Transparency is generally good, with consistent annual filings available. The absence of officer compensation is a positive indicator of low administrative burden. However, without a detailed breakdown of expenses beyond total expenses, it's challenging to fully assess the proportion of funds directly going to charitable programs versus other operational costs. For a private foundation, the primary 'program' is grant-making, and understanding the total grants distributed relative to total expenses would be key to a complete transparency assessment.