Is A Philip Randolph Educational Fund Legit?

Quick charity verification for A Philip Randolph Educational Fund (EIN: 136180232)

Verdict: A Philip Randolph Educational Fund shows mixed signals

65/100Mission Score
$144KRevenue
$243KAssets
3Red Flags
3Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

Spending Breakdown

How A Philip Randolph Educational Fund allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about A Philip Randolph Educational Fund

Is A Philip Randolph Educational Fund a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, A Philip Randolph Educational Fund (EIN: 136180232) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.

Is A Philip Randolph Educational Fund a good charity to donate to?

A Philip Randolph Educational Fund has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $144K. Assets: $243K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for A Philip Randolph Educational Fund?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for A Philip Randolph Educational Fund is 136180232. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does A Philip Randolph Educational Fund spend its money?

A Philip Randolph Educational Fund allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify A Philip Randolph Educational Fund's tax-exempt status?

You can verify A Philip Randolph Educational Fund's tax-exempt status using EIN 136180232 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

The A Philip Randolph Educational Fund demonstrates inconsistent financial performance over the past decade. While the organization has reported revenue as high as $563,373 in 2020 and $524,505 in 2021, its latest reported revenue is $143,994, indicating a significant decline. Expenses have often exceeded revenue, as seen in 2023 ($221,830 expenses vs. $192,222 revenue) and 2017 ($229,640 expenses vs. $169,030 revenue), suggesting potential operational challenges or reliance on reserves. The organization's assets have fluctuated considerably, from a low of $49,961 in 2014 to a high of $386,460 in 2021, currently standing at $243,414. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings suggests either a volunteer-led executive team or compensation being reported under other expense categories, which could impact transparency regarding leadership costs. Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, which are not provided in the summary data. However, the frequent deficits (expenses exceeding revenue) raise questions about long-term financial sustainability if not consistently covered by prior surpluses or specific grants. The absence of reported officer compensation could be a positive indicator of low overhead, but without further detail, it's hard to confirm. The organization's liabilities have also varied, reaching $203,094 in 2021, but were reported as $0 in 2023, indicating a significant improvement in its debt position. Transparency regarding executive compensation is high, as 0% is consistently reported. However, the lack of detailed expense breakdowns (program vs. admin vs. fundraising) in the provided data limits a comprehensive assessment of spending efficiency. The fluctuating financial figures suggest a need for consistent revenue streams and expense management to ensure stable operations and predictable impact.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages