How Action Against Hunger Usa allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Action Against Hunger Usa
Is Action Against Hunger Usa a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Action Against Hunger Usa (EIN: 133327220) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 90/100. 1 red flag identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is Action Against Hunger Usa a good charity to donate to?
Action Against Hunger Usa has a Mission Score of 90/100. Revenue: $161.1M. Assets: $81.7M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Action Against Hunger Usa?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Action Against Hunger Usa is 133327220. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Action Against Hunger Usa spend its money?
Action Against Hunger Usa allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Action Against Hunger Usa's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Action Against Hunger Usa's tax-exempt status using EIN 133327220 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Action Against Hunger USA demonstrates strong financial health and a clear commitment to its programmatic mission. In the latest filing (202312), the organization reported robust revenue of $201,188,874 against expenses of $152,338,872, indicating a significant surplus that contributes to its growing asset base of $160,068,290. This financial strength allows for substantial program delivery. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings suggests a high degree of transparency regarding executive pay, as it implies that either no officers receive compensation or it is reported in a way that doesn't appear in this specific field, which would warrant further investigation for full clarity. Overall, the organization appears to be well-managed and focused on its mission.