How Actors Equity Association allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Actors Equity Association
Is Actors Equity Association a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Actors Equity Association (EIN: 130413995) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 2 red flags identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is Actors Equity Association a good charity to donate to?
Actors Equity Association has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $31.0M. Assets: $89.8M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Actors Equity Association?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Actors Equity Association is 130413995. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Actors Equity Association spend its money?
Actors Equity Association allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Actors Equity Association's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Actors Equity Association's tax-exempt status using EIN 130413995 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Actors Equity Association demonstrates a generally stable financial position, with assets growing significantly from $54,856,596 in 2014 to $89,797,919 currently. Revenue has also shown a strong upward trend, particularly in the most recent periods, reaching $30,982,903. The organization consistently manages its expenses, often operating with a slight surplus or near break-even, as seen in 2023 where revenue was $29,442,478 against expenses of $27,763,194. This indicates prudent financial management.
Spending efficiency appears reasonable, though without detailed functional expense breakdowns from the provided data, a precise assessment is challenging. However, the consistent operational performance suggests that funds are being utilized effectively to support its mission. The organization's transparency is bolstered by its consistent filing of IRS Form 990s, with 13 filings available, providing a decade-long financial history for public scrutiny.
One notable aspect is the reported 0% officer compensation across all available filings, which could indicate that executive compensation is either not reported in this specific field or is covered under other expense categories, or that the organization's structure does not involve compensated officers in the traditional sense reported on the 990 summary. Further investigation into the full 990 forms would be necessary to fully understand executive remuneration practices.