Recurring operational deficits (e.g., $216,005 in 202307, $198,607 in 201707)
Significant fluctuations in assets and liabilities year-over-year
Downward trend in revenue from 201407 to 202307
Strengths
0% reported officer compensation across all filings, indicating strong commitment to mission
Consistent history of filing IRS Form 990, demonstrating transparency
Maintains significant assets in some periods, such as $840,878 in 202207
Spending Breakdown
How Actors Shakespeare Project Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Actors Shakespeare Project Inc
Is Actors Shakespeare Project Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Actors Shakespeare Project Inc (EIN: 200815685) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Actors Shakespeare Project Inc a good charity to donate to?
Actors Shakespeare Project Inc has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $986K. Assets: $394K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Actors Shakespeare Project Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Actors Shakespeare Project Inc is 200815685. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Actors Shakespeare Project Inc spend its money?
Actors Shakespeare Project Inc allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Actors Shakespeare Project Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Actors Shakespeare Project Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 200815685 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Actors Shakespeare Project Inc demonstrates a fluctuating financial performance over the past decade. While revenue has generally been in the range of $850,000 to $1.8 million, expenses have often exceeded revenue, leading to periods of net losses, such as in 202307 where expenses of $1,070,582 outstripped revenue of $854,577. This trend suggests a need for tighter financial management or increased fundraising efforts to ensure long-term sustainability. The organization's assets have also shown considerable variability, from a low of $98,066 in 201807 to a high of $890,525 in 201407, indicating an inconsistent financial position.
The organization's transparency appears strong regarding executive compensation, as all filings indicate 0% officer compensation. This suggests that the leadership is either volunteer-based or compensated through other means not categorized as officer compensation, which is a positive sign for donor confidence. However, the consistent operational deficits in several years, including 202307, 201807, 201707, and 201607, raise concerns about spending efficiency relative to its program delivery. A detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses would provide further insight into its operational efficiency.
Overall, while the lack of officer compensation is commendable, the organization's financial health is marked by inconsistent revenue generation and expense management. The significant swings in assets and liabilities, coupled with recurring deficits, suggest a need for a more stable financial strategy. Donors should consider these trends when evaluating the organization's long-term viability and impact.