How Advocates For Quality Developmentinc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Advocates For Quality Developmentinc
Is Advocates For Quality Developmentinc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Advocates For Quality Developmentinc (EIN: 204409262) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 0 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Advocates For Quality Developmentinc a good charity to donate to?
Advocates For Quality Developmentinc has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $26K. Assets: $79K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Advocates For Quality Developmentinc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Advocates For Quality Developmentinc is 204409262. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Advocates For Quality Developmentinc spend its money?
Advocates For Quality Developmentinc allocates 85% to programs, 15% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Advocates For Quality Developmentinc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Advocates For Quality Developmentinc's tax-exempt status using EIN 204409262 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Advocates For Quality Developmentinc appears to be a very small organization with consistently low revenue and expenses over the past decade. Its financial health seems stable, with assets growing steadily from $44,171 in 2014 to $79,019 currently, and no reported liabilities, indicating a strong balance sheet. However, the organization's scale of operations is minimal, with the latest reported revenue at $25,876 and expenses at $4,536 in 2023, suggesting limited program reach.
The spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed functional expense breakdown, which is not typically required for organizations of this size. Given the very low expense figures, it's likely that a significant portion of funds goes directly to its mission, but without specific program spending data, this remains an assumption. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings indicates that leadership is likely volunteer-based, which is a positive sign for resource allocation.
Transparency is good in terms of filing compliance, with 12 filings available. The consistent reporting of no liabilities and no officer compensation enhances trust. However, the lack of detailed expense breakdowns due to its small size means less granular insight into how funds are specifically utilized for programs versus administrative overhead.