Is Aging Services For Communities Legit? —…

Quick charity verification for Aging Services For Communities (EIN: 201939963)

Spending Breakdown

How Aging Services For Communities allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

85%

Program Spending

Healthy — majority goes to mission

10%

Admin Costs

Reasonable — admin costs in check

Fundraising

Within typical range

How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Aging Services For Communities

Is Aging Services For Communities a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Aging Services For Communities (EIN: 201939963) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 1 red flag identified, 3 strengths noted.

Is Aging Services For Communities a good charity to donate to?

Aging Services For Communities has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $995K. Assets: $558K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Aging Services For Communities?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Aging Services For Communities is 201939963. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Aging Services For Communities spend its money?

Aging Services For Communities allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Aging Services For Communities's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Aging Services For Communities's tax-exempt status using EIN 201939963 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

Aging Services For Communities demonstrates a generally stable financial position, with recent filings showing consistent revenue generation around the $700,000 to $800,000 range. In the 202312 period, the organization reported revenue of $799,380 against expenses of $767,708, indicating a modest surplus. While assets have grown over time, reaching $493,559 in 202312, the presence of $552,000 in liabilities in the same period, following zero liabilities in previous years, warrants closer examination to understand its nature and impact on financial health. The organization's consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings is a strong indicator of transparency and a commitment to directing funds towards its mission rather than executive salaries.

The organization's spending efficiency appears reasonable, with expenses generally tracking closely to revenue. For instance, in 202312, expenses were 96% of revenue. The absence of reported officer compensation suggests a lean operational structure at the top. However, without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, a precise assessment of spending efficiency is challenging. The NTEE code P44 (Services for the Elderly) suggests a direct service model, which typically benefits from high program spending.

Transparency is a significant strength for Aging Services For Communities, primarily due to the consistent disclosure of 0% officer compensation. This practice is highly commendable and signals a strong ethical stance regarding executive pay. The consistent filing of IRS Form 990s over many years also contributes to its transparency, allowing for historical financial analysis. The sudden appearance of significant liabilities in the latest filing, however, introduces a new element that would require further inquiry to maintain full transparency regarding its financial commitments.

Is Aging Services For Communities Legit?

Verdict: Aging Services For Communities appears trustworthy

Red Flags

Strengths