Minimal financial activity makes it difficult to assess program impact or efficiency
Strengths
No executive compensation reported across all filings
No reported liabilities, indicating financial solvency
Stable asset base maintained over several years despite low revenue
Spending Breakdown
How Alabama Alpha Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
0%
Program Spending
Concerning — less than half to programs
0%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Alabama Alpha Foundation
Is Alabama Alpha Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Alabama Alpha Foundation (EIN: 200747152) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 40/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Alabama Alpha Foundation a good charity to donate to?
Alabama Alpha Foundation has a Mission Score of 40/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Alabama Alpha Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Alabama Alpha Foundation is 200747152. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Alabama Alpha Foundation spend its money?
Alabama Alpha Foundation allocates 0% to programs, 0% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Alabama Alpha Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Alabama Alpha Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 200747152 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Alabama Alpha Foundation appears to be a very small organization with minimal financial activity. Over the past six years, its annual revenue has consistently been under $2,500, and its expenses have also been very low, typically around $1,000-$2,800. The organization has maintained a stable asset base, hovering around $93,000 to $101,000, with no reported liabilities, indicating a healthy balance sheet in terms of solvency. However, the consistent reporting of zero revenue and zero assets in the latest filing (which contradicts prior filings showing assets) suggests a potential data discrepancy or a significant change in the organization's operational status that warrants further investigation. Given the minimal financial activity, it's challenging to assess spending efficiency in a traditional sense, as the scale of operations is extremely limited. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation indicates good stewardship in that area, as no executive salaries are being paid from the small pool of funds.