Consistent trend of expenses exceeding revenue in most historical periods (e.g., 2017, 2016, 2014, 2013, 2012), leading to asset depletion.
Significant decline in assets from $121,793 in 2011 to $0 in the latest period.
Strengths
No officer compensation reported across all filings, suggesting volunteer leadership and efficient use of funds for overhead.
Consistent filing of IRS 990s for seven periods, demonstrating historical transparency.
Spending Breakdown
How Alaskans For Palmer Hay Flats allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Alaskans For Palmer Hay Flats
Is Alaskans For Palmer Hay Flats a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Alaskans For Palmer Hay Flats (EIN: 203556229) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 45/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Alaskans For Palmer Hay Flats a good charity to donate to?
Alaskans For Palmer Hay Flats has a Mission Score of 45/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Alaskans For Palmer Hay Flats?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Alaskans For Palmer Hay Flats is 203556229. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Alaskans For Palmer Hay Flats spend its money?
Alaskans For Palmer Hay Flats allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Alaskans For Palmer Hay Flats's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Alaskans For Palmer Hay Flats's tax-exempt status using EIN 203556229 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Alaskans For Palmer Hay Flats appears to be a very small organization, as indicated by its latest reported revenue and assets of $0. This suggests it may be inactive or operating on an extremely limited basis. Historically, its financial activity has been modest, with revenues fluctuating significantly, peaking at $171,956 in 2015 but dropping to $4,336 in 2017. The organization consistently reported expenses exceeding revenue in most years, leading to a decline in assets from $121,793 in 2011 to $24,281 in 2017, before reaching $0 in the latest filing. This trend of spending more than it earns is a concern for long-term sustainability.
Given the lack of detailed expense breakdowns in the provided data, it's challenging to fully assess spending efficiency. However, the consistent absence of officer compensation reported across all filings suggests that leadership may be volunteer-based, which can be a positive indicator of resource allocation towards mission-related activities. The organization's transparency is generally good, with seven years of 990 filings available, providing a historical financial record. However, the current $0 revenue and assets raise questions about its current operational status and future viability.
Overall, while the historical data shows some program activity, the recent financial dormancy and past trend of deficit spending are significant concerns. The organization's ability to effectively utilize funds for its mission is difficult to ascertain without more granular expense data, but the lack of executive compensation is a positive note regarding overhead.