Quick charity verification for Allume Society (EIN: 208743447)
Verdict: Allume Society has notable concerns
30/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
2Red Flags
1Strengths
Red Flags
Latest filing shows $0 revenue and $0 assets, indicating potential dormancy or cessation of operations.
Significant decline in financial activity from previous periods to the latest filing.
Strengths
Historically reported 0% officer compensation, indicating volunteer leadership in prior active periods.
Spending Breakdown
How Allume Society allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Allume Society
Is Allume Society a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Allume Society (EIN: 208743447) has notable concerns. Mission Score: 30/100. 2 red flags identified, 1 strength noted.
Is Allume Society a good charity to donate to?
Allume Society has a Mission Score of 30/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Allume Society?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Allume Society is 208743447. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Allume Society spend its money?
Allume Society allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Allume Society's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Allume Society's tax-exempt status using EIN 208743447 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Allume Society's financial health shows a concerning trend. While the organization reported $18,282 in revenue and $5,308 in expenses in 2014, and $32,295 in revenue with $66,271 in expenses in 2011, their latest filing indicates $0 in both revenue and assets. This suggests a significant decline in operations or potential dormancy. The lack of recent financial activity makes it difficult to assess current spending efficiency or financial health.
Historically, the organization demonstrated a strong program focus, with officer compensation consistently reported at 0% in both 2011 and 2014, indicating that leadership was not drawing a salary from the organization. However, the current state of $0 revenue and assets raises serious questions about its ongoing viability and ability to fulfill its mission. Transparency is limited by the absence of recent detailed financial data.
Given the latest reported $0 revenue and assets, it's challenging to provide a current assessment of financial health or spending efficiency. The historical data shows periods of both surplus and deficit, but the current status is a major concern for any potential donor or stakeholder.