Significant and consistent decline in revenue from 2014 to 2016 (from $363,500 to $100,795).
Operating at a deficit in the most recent filing (2016: Expenses $128,125 vs. Revenue $100,795).
Lack of detailed expense breakdown (program, admin, fundraising) in the provided data.
Strengths
Consistently reported zero liabilities, indicating no debt.
0% officer compensation across all filings, suggesting efficient use of funds at the executive level.
Maintained positive assets in all reported periods, though fluctuating.
Spending Breakdown
How Alpha Delta Fraternity allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Alpha Delta Fraternity
Is Alpha Delta Fraternity a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Alpha Delta Fraternity (EIN: 20354522) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Alpha Delta Fraternity a good charity to donate to?
Alpha Delta Fraternity has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Alpha Delta Fraternity?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Alpha Delta Fraternity is 20354522. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Alpha Delta Fraternity spend its money?
Alpha Delta Fraternity allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Alpha Delta Fraternity's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Alpha Delta Fraternity's tax-exempt status using EIN 20354522 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Alpha Delta Fraternity's financial health appears to be in a state of decline, as evidenced by a significant drop in revenue from $301,515 in 2015 to $100,795 in 2016, alongside expenses exceeding revenue in the most recent filing ($128,125 vs. $100,795). While the organization consistently reported zero liabilities across all filings, indicating a lack of debt, the trend of declining revenue and operating deficits is concerning. The organization's assets have also fluctuated, peaking at $63,995 in 2015 before falling to $36,665 in 2016.
Without detailed expense breakdowns beyond total expenses, it's challenging to fully assess spending efficiency. However, the consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings suggests that executive overhead is not a financial burden. The lack of specific program spending data makes it difficult to determine the proportion of funds directly allocated to its mission. The organization's transparency is moderate, providing basic financial figures but lacking granular detail on program activities or administrative costs.