How Amalgamated Transit Union allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Amalgamated Transit Union
Is Amalgamated Transit Union a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Amalgamated Transit Union (EIN: 220729430) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is Amalgamated Transit Union a good charity to donate to?
Amalgamated Transit Union has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $181K. Assets: $40K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Amalgamated Transit Union?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Amalgamated Transit Union is 220729430. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Amalgamated Transit Union spend its money?
Amalgamated Transit Union allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Amalgamated Transit Union's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Amalgamated Transit Union's tax-exempt status using EIN 220729430 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Amalgamated Transit Union demonstrates consistent financial activity, with revenues generally exceeding or closely matching expenses over the past decade. For instance, in 2023, revenue was $168,216 against expenses of $123,383, indicating a surplus. The organization's assets have fluctuated but show a positive trend, increasing from $2,574 in 2016 to $57,809 in 2023, suggesting prudent financial management and accumulation of reserves. Liabilities have consistently been reported as $0, which is a strong indicator of financial stability and a lack of debt.
Spending efficiency appears reasonable given the consistent operational scale. Without a detailed breakdown of program versus administrative costs, it's challenging to precisely assess efficiency, but the overall financial health seems stable. The consistent reporting of zero officer compensation across all filings indicates a volunteer-led or very lean executive structure, which can contribute to lower administrative overhead. The organization's transparency is good in terms of filing its IRS 990s consistently, providing a clear historical financial record.
However, the lack of NTEE code and detailed spending categories in the provided data limits a deeper analysis of program effectiveness and specific operational efficiency. While the financial health is stable, a more granular view of how funds are allocated would enhance transparency and allow for a more precise evaluation of spending efficiency.