Is American Association For Public Opinion Research Legit?
Quick charity verification for American Association For Public Opinion Research (EIN: 136163548)
Verdict: American Association For Public Opinion Research appears trustworthy
85/100Mission Score
$1.7MRevenue
$1.8MAssets
2Red Flags
4Strengths
Red Flags
Lack of detailed functional expense breakdown in provided data makes precise efficiency assessment difficult.
Consistent 0% officer compensation for an organization with over $1M in revenue is unusual and warrants further scrutiny of compensation practices.
Strengths
Consistent financial stability with revenues generally exceeding expenses (e.g., 2023 revenue $1,835,058 vs. expenses $1,670,036).
Healthy asset base, consistently maintaining over $1.6 million in assets.
No reported officer compensation, indicating potential volunteer leadership or highly efficient compensation structures.
Manageable liabilities relative to assets, suggesting good financial health (e.g., 2023 liabilities $239,936 vs. assets $1,848,763).
Spending Breakdown
How American Association For Public Opinion Research allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about American Association For Public Opinion Research
Is American Association For Public Opinion Research a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, American Association For Public Opinion Research (EIN: 136163548) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is American Association For Public Opinion Research a good charity to donate to?
American Association For Public Opinion Research has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $1.7M. Assets: $1.8M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for American Association For Public Opinion Research?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for American Association For Public Opinion Research is 136163548. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does American Association For Public Opinion Research spend its money?
American Association For Public Opinion Research allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify American Association For Public Opinion Research's tax-exempt status?
You can verify American Association For Public Opinion Research's tax-exempt status using EIN 136163548 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The American Association For Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) demonstrates consistent financial health, with revenues generally exceeding or closely matching expenses over the past decade. For instance, in 2023, revenue was $1,835,058 against expenses of $1,670,036, indicating a surplus. The organization maintains a healthy asset base, with assets consistently around $1.6 million to $2.1 million, and liabilities that are a manageable portion of total assets. This suggests good financial stewardship and stability.
Regarding spending efficiency, without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses from the provided data, it's challenging to precisely assess efficiency ratios. However, the consistent operational surpluses in most years suggest that the organization is managing its expenses effectively relative to its income. The absence of reported officer compensation across all filings is a significant indicator of transparency and potentially lower administrative overhead, as it suggests that the organization's leadership may be volunteer-based or compensated through other means not categorized as officer compensation.
Overall, AAPOR appears to be a financially stable and well-managed organization. The consistent asset levels and generally positive net income trends point to a sustainable operational model. The lack of reported officer compensation is a strong positive for transparency and efficient use of funds, assuming other compensation is reasonable and disclosed elsewhere. Further analysis would benefit from a detailed functional expense breakdown to fully evaluate program spending efficiency.