Positive net income in the latest filing period (202309)
Liabilities consistently low relative to assets
Spending Breakdown
How American Maritime Officers Service allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about American Maritime Officers Service
Is American Maritime Officers Service a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, American Maritime Officers Service (EIN: 112579099) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is American Maritime Officers Service a good charity to donate to?
American Maritime Officers Service has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $777K. Assets: $203K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for American Maritime Officers Service?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for American Maritime Officers Service is 112579099. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does American Maritime Officers Service spend its money?
American Maritime Officers Service allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify American Maritime Officers Service's tax-exempt status?
You can verify American Maritime Officers Service's tax-exempt status using EIN 112579099 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
American Maritime Officers Service demonstrates a fluctuating financial performance over the past decade. While the organization reported a positive net income in the latest filing period (202309) with revenue of $696,088 exceeding expenses of $689,424, this follows several years of operating deficits, notably in 202109 where expenses ($560,490) significantly outstripped revenue ($99,699). The organization's assets have also seen considerable variation, from a high of $715,355 in 201809 to a low of $99,978 in 201609, currently standing at $156,777. This volatility suggests potential challenges in consistent revenue generation or expense management.
The organization consistently reports 0% officer compensation, which is a strong indicator of transparency and a commitment to directing funds towards its mission rather than executive salaries. However, without a detailed breakdown of expenses into program, administrative, and fundraising categories, it's challenging to fully assess spending efficiency. The lack of an NTEE code also makes it difficult to benchmark its financial performance against similar organizations.
Overall, while the absence of executive compensation is a positive sign for transparency, the inconsistent financial results and lack of detailed expense allocation in the provided data make a comprehensive assessment of spending efficiency challenging. The organization appears to be managing its liabilities, which have remained relatively stable and low compared to assets.