Significant asset growth (from $16.5M in 2014 to $57.2M in 2023)
Strong financial stability and operational capacity
Manageable liabilities relative to assets
Spending Breakdown
How Anderson Center For Autism allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Anderson Center For Autism
Is Anderson Center For Autism a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Anderson Center For Autism (EIN: 141598279) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 88/100. 1 red flag identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is Anderson Center For Autism a good charity to donate to?
Anderson Center For Autism has a Mission Score of 88/100. Revenue: $48.6M. Assets: $58.9M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Anderson Center For Autism?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Anderson Center For Autism is 141598279. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Anderson Center For Autism spend its money?
Anderson Center For Autism allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Anderson Center For Autism's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Anderson Center For Autism's tax-exempt status using EIN 141598279 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Anderson Center For Autism demonstrates consistent financial growth and a strong commitment to its mission, as evidenced by its IRS 990 filings. Over the past decade, the organization has seen its revenue grow from $29.3 million in 2014 to $46.7 million in 2023, indicating robust fundraising and operational stability. The organization consistently operates with a surplus, with expenses generally lower than revenue, contributing to a healthy increase in assets from $16.5 million in 2014 to $57.2 million in 2023. This financial prudence suggests effective management of resources.
The spending efficiency appears strong, with a significant portion of expenses likely directed towards program services, given the consistent surpluses and asset growth. The absence of reported officer compensation in the provided data for all periods is a notable point regarding executive compensation, suggesting either a different compensation structure or that these details are reported elsewhere. The organization's increasing asset base and manageable liabilities (e.g., 2023 liabilities of $19.8 million against assets of $57.2 million) further underscore its financial health and capacity to sustain its operations and mission.