Quick charity verification for Animal Allies (EIN: 20469900)
Verdict: Animal Allies shows mixed signals
65/100Mission Score
$38KRevenue
$737Assets
3Red Flags
3Strengths
Red Flags
Consistent deficit spending (expenses exceeding revenue in 9 of 10 periods)
Significant decline in assets from $36,467 in 2014 to $737 in 2023
Limited financial reserves to cover future operational deficits
Strengths
0% officer compensation, indicating volunteer leadership and high dedication
No reported liabilities, suggesting responsible debt management
Consistent filing of IRS 990 forms, demonstrating transparency
Spending Breakdown
How Animal Allies allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Animal Allies
Is Animal Allies a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Animal Allies (EIN: 20469900) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Animal Allies a good charity to donate to?
Animal Allies has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $38K. Assets: $737. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Animal Allies?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Animal Allies is 20469900. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Animal Allies spend its money?
Animal Allies allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Animal Allies's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Animal Allies's tax-exempt status using EIN 20469900 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Animal Allies appears to be a very small, volunteer-run organization based on its financial data. With latest reported revenue of $37,857 and assets of only $737, it operates on a minimal budget. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings indicates that its leadership is unpaid, which is a strong positive for donor confidence and suggests a high degree of dedication to its mission. However, the organization has consistently spent more than it brought in for most of the past decade, with expenses exceeding revenue in 9 out of the last 10 reported periods. This trend, coupled with a significant decline in assets from a high of $36,467 in 2014 to just $737 currently, raises concerns about its long-term financial sustainability. While the lack of liabilities is a positive, the shrinking asset base suggests the organization may be drawing down reserves to cover operational deficits.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, which are not provided in the summary data. However, the absence of officer compensation implies that a significant portion of funds, after covering direct program costs, would likely go towards other operational needs rather than executive salaries. The consistent deficit spending, where expenses have exceeded revenue by an average of approximately $7,000 annually over the last three years, indicates a potential struggle to maintain operations within its current funding levels. Transparency is good in terms of officer compensation, but more detailed expense reporting would enhance understanding of how funds are allocated.