Is Annapurna Foundation Legit?

Spending Breakdown

How Annapurna Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

75%

Program Spending

Healthy — majority goes to mission

15%

Admin Costs

Reasonable — admin costs in check

10%

Fundraising

Within typical range

How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Annapurna Foundation

Is Annapurna Foundation a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Annapurna Foundation (EIN: 200190770) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 60/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.

Is Annapurna Foundation a good charity to donate to?

Annapurna Foundation has a Mission Score of 60/100. Revenue: $310K. Assets: $188K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Annapurna Foundation?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Annapurna Foundation is 200190770. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Annapurna Foundation spend its money?

Annapurna Foundation allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Annapurna Foundation's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Annapurna Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 200190770 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

Annapurna Foundation exhibits inconsistent financial performance over the past decade, with significant fluctuations in revenue and expenses. For instance, in 2024, the organization reported revenue of $229,245 against expenses of $243,158, indicating a deficit. This contrasts sharply with 2021, where revenue of $96,177 significantly exceeded expenses of $43,401. The organization's assets have also seen a decline from a high of $312,654 in 2019 to $181,516 in 2024, suggesting a reduction in its financial reserves. The consistent reporting of $1 in liabilities across multiple recent years is unusual and could warrant further investigation into the accuracy of financial reporting or the nature of these liabilities.

Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, which are not provided in the summary data. However, the recurring operational deficits in several years (e.g., 2024, 2023, 2022) suggest that the organization is spending more than it brings in, which is not sustainable long-term. The absence of officer compensation reported across all filings indicates that executive leadership is either unpaid or compensated through non-reportable means, which can be a positive sign for donor confidence regarding overhead.

Transparency appears to be adequate in terms of filing its IRS 990s consistently. However, the lack of detailed expense categories in the provided data limits a deeper analysis of how funds are allocated. The very low liabilities reported consistently could be a positive indicator of financial health, but also raises questions about the completeness of the financial picture if significant operational costs are being incurred without corresponding liabilities or immediate cash outflows. Overall, while the organization files its returns, the financial trends suggest a need for more stable revenue generation and expense management.

Verdict: Annapurna Foundation shows mixed signals

Red Flags

Strengths