Zero officer compensation reported across all filings, indicating volunteer leadership and efficient use of limited funds for administrative salaries.
Spending Breakdown
How Annard Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Annard Foundation
Is Annard Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Annard Foundation (EIN: 20477072) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 45/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Annard Foundation a good charity to donate to?
Annard Foundation has a Mission Score of 45/100. Revenue: $350. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Annard Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Annard Foundation is 20477072. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Annard Foundation spend its money?
Annard Foundation allocates 80% to programs, 20% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Annard Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Annard Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 20477072 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Annard Foundation appears to be a very small, family-run or volunteer-driven organization given its consistently low revenue and expenses, and zero officer compensation reported across all filings. Its financial health is precarious, with assets consistently very low or declining, and expenses often exceeding revenue, such as in 2022 where expenses were $260 against $200 in revenue. The organization's latest revenue of $350 and assets of $0 indicate minimal financial activity and no significant reserves.
Spending efficiency is difficult to assess without a detailed breakdown of expenses, but the overall scale of operations suggests a very lean structure. Given the zero officer compensation, it's likely that administrative costs are minimal, primarily covering operational necessities. However, the lack of significant program spending due to limited funds means its impact is inherently constrained.
Transparency is generally good, as evidenced by consistent IRS 990 filings, even for an organization of this size. The consistent reporting of zero officer compensation enhances trust, indicating that funds are not being used for executive salaries. However, the lack of detailed expense categories in the provided data limits a deeper analysis of how the small funds are allocated between programs, administration, and fundraising.