Quick charity verification for Anson Historical Society (EIN: 10533833)
Verdict: Anson Historical Society shows mixed signals
60/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
2Red Flags
2Strengths
Red Flags
No reported revenue or assets, making financial health assessment impossible
Limited financial transparency due to lack of reported activity
Strengths
Likely volunteer-driven, indicating community engagement
No reported executive compensation, suggesting efficient use of any potential resources
Spending Breakdown
How Anson Historical Society allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
100%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
0%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Anson Historical Society
Is Anson Historical Society a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Anson Historical Society (EIN: 10533833) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 60/100. 2 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Anson Historical Society a good charity to donate to?
Anson Historical Society has a Mission Score of 60/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Anson Historical Society?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Anson Historical Society is 10533833. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Anson Historical Society spend its money?
Anson Historical Society allocates 100% to programs, 0% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Anson Historical Society's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Anson Historical Society's tax-exempt status using EIN 10533833 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Anson Historical Society appears to be a very small, volunteer-run organization based on the provided IRS 990 data. With $0 in reported revenue and assets, it suggests that the society operates on an extremely limited budget, likely relying on in-kind donations, volunteer labor, and perhaps very small, unreported cash transactions that fall below filing thresholds or are handled outside of formal financial reporting for this specific filing. This lack of financial activity makes a traditional assessment of financial health and spending efficiency difficult, as there are no funds to analyze. Transparency is also limited by the absence of financial details, though for an organization of this apparent size, the filing itself indicates a basic level of compliance.