How Arizona Alliance For Retired Americans allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Arizona Alliance For Retired Americans
Is Arizona Alliance For Retired Americans a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Arizona Alliance For Retired Americans (EIN: 200648869) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 92/100. 0 red flags identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is Arizona Alliance For Retired Americans a good charity to donate to?
Arizona Alliance For Retired Americans has a Mission Score of 92/100. Revenue: $133K. Assets: $152K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Arizona Alliance For Retired Americans?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Arizona Alliance For Retired Americans is 200648869. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Arizona Alliance For Retired Americans spend its money?
Arizona Alliance For Retired Americans allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Arizona Alliance For Retired Americans's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Arizona Alliance For Retired Americans's tax-exempt status using EIN 200648869 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Arizona Alliance For Retired Americans demonstrates sound financial health and efficient spending based on its recent IRS 990 filings. In the 2023 fiscal period, the organization reported revenues of $173,983 against expenses of $90,009, indicating a healthy surplus that contributed to an increase in assets from $57,235 in 2021 to $152,583 in 2023. This growth in assets, coupled with zero reported liabilities in both periods, suggests strong financial management and stability. The organization's commitment to its mission is further highlighted by its efficient use of funds, with a significant portion directed towards program services.
The organization's spending efficiency is commendable, with expenses consistently well below revenue, allowing for asset accumulation. The absence of officer compensation reported in both filings is a strong indicator of volunteer-driven leadership, which can significantly reduce administrative overhead and maximize funds available for programs. This practice enhances the organization's financial sustainability and its ability to deliver on its mission without the burden of high executive salaries. The consistent financial health and growth, combined with no liabilities, paint a picture of a well-managed and responsible nonprofit.
Transparency is also a strong point, with clear financial reporting showing no liabilities and consistent asset growth. The lack of officer compensation is a key transparency metric, demonstrating that the organization's resources are not being diverted to executive pay. This level of financial clarity and responsible stewardship builds trust and assures donors that their contributions are being used effectively to support the organization's objectives.