Strong program spending due to 0% officer compensation
Consistent asset growth from $2,000 in 2012 to $37,256 in 2016
Low to no liabilities reported across most filing periods
Positive net income (revenue exceeding expenses) in all reported periods
Consistent IRS 990 filing history demonstrating transparency
Spending Breakdown
How Arizonas Piggie Poo Rescue allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Arizonas Piggie Poo Rescue
Is Arizonas Piggie Poo Rescue a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Arizonas Piggie Poo Rescue (EIN: 205738769) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 95/100. 0 red flags identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is Arizonas Piggie Poo Rescue a good charity to donate to?
Arizonas Piggie Poo Rescue has a Mission Score of 95/100. Revenue: $133K. Assets: $37K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Arizonas Piggie Poo Rescue?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Arizonas Piggie Poo Rescue is 205738769. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Arizonas Piggie Poo Rescue spend its money?
Arizonas Piggie Poo Rescue allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Arizonas Piggie Poo Rescue's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Arizonas Piggie Poo Rescue's tax-exempt status using EIN 205738769 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Arizonas Piggie Poo Rescue demonstrates consistent financial health with a positive net asset growth over the past five years, increasing from $2,000 in 2012 to $37,256 in 2016. The organization's revenue has fluctuated but generally shown growth, reaching $132,788 in its latest reported period. A significant strength is the complete absence of reported officer compensation across all available filings, indicating that leadership is likely volunteer-based, which can maximize funds for program services.
The organization appears to be highly efficient in its spending, with expenses consistently below revenue, allowing for asset accumulation. The lack of reported liabilities in most periods also points to sound financial management. While specific breakdowns of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses are not detailed in the provided summary, the overall financial picture suggests a strong focus on mission given the zero officer compensation.
Transparency is good through its consistent IRS 990 filings. The consistent growth in assets and the absence of liabilities, coupled with no officer compensation, suggest a well-managed and fiscally responsible small nonprofit. Further detailed expense breakdowns would enhance the transparency report.