No reported liabilities across all filings, demonstrating financial prudence.
Historically maintained positive asset balances relative to its small size.
Spending Breakdown
How Arkansas Pontiac Association allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Arkansas Pontiac Association
Is Arkansas Pontiac Association a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Arkansas Pontiac Association (EIN: 141847937) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 1 red flag identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Arkansas Pontiac Association a good charity to donate to?
Arkansas Pontiac Association has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Arkansas Pontiac Association?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Arkansas Pontiac Association is 141847937. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Arkansas Pontiac Association spend its money?
Arkansas Pontiac Association allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Arkansas Pontiac Association's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Arkansas Pontiac Association's tax-exempt status using EIN 141847937 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Arkansas Pontiac Association appears to be a very small, volunteer-run organization with minimal financial activity. Its latest filing shows $0 in revenue and assets, which suggests it may be inactive or operating on an extremely limited basis. In previous years, its revenue and expenses have consistently been in the range of $3,000-$8,000, with assets typically under $6,000. The organization has consistently reported 0% officer compensation across all available filings, indicating a strong reliance on volunteer efforts and a commitment to directing all funds towards its stated purpose. Given its small scale and lack of significant financial transactions, detailed analysis of spending efficiency is challenging, but the absence of liabilities and officer compensation are positive indicators for a small, member-based association.
The organization's financial health, based on historical data, has been stable but very modest. It has consistently maintained a positive asset balance and no liabilities, suggesting responsible financial management for its size. The lack of recent financial activity, however, raises questions about its current operational status. Transparency is high in terms of compensation, as no officers receive salaries, which is typical for very small, hobby-related associations.