Recurring negative asset balances in multiple historical filings (e.g., $-57 in 2017, $-430 in 2014) suggest financial instability.
Inconsistent revenue generation over the years, with significant drops.
Strengths
Consistently reports 0% officer compensation, indicating a volunteer-run model.
No reported liabilities across all filings, suggesting a debt-free operation.
Historically, expenses generally align closely with revenue, indicating tight financial management.
Spending Breakdown
How Assisting Incarcerated Muslims allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
100%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
0%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Assisting Incarcerated Muslims
Is Assisting Incarcerated Muslims a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Assisting Incarcerated Muslims (EIN: 141981644) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 50/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Assisting Incarcerated Muslims a good charity to donate to?
Assisting Incarcerated Muslims has a Mission Score of 50/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Assisting Incarcerated Muslims?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Assisting Incarcerated Muslims is 141981644. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Assisting Incarcerated Muslims spend its money?
Assisting Incarcerated Muslims allocates 100% to programs, 0% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Assisting Incarcerated Muslims's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Assisting Incarcerated Muslims's tax-exempt status using EIN 141981644 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Assisting Incarcerated Muslims appears to be a very small, volunteer-run organization with minimal financial activity. The latest filing shows $0 in revenue and assets, suggesting it may be inactive or operating on an extremely limited scale. Historically, its revenue has fluctuated, with a peak of $36,813 in 2018, but generally remaining below $15,000 annually. The organization consistently reports $0 in liabilities and officer compensation, indicating a lack of debt and no paid executive staff, which is positive for transparency and efficiency. However, the recurring negative asset balances in several years (e.g., $-57 in 2017, $-430 in 2014) raise questions about its financial management and ability to maintain a stable financial position, although these amounts are very small.
Given the absence of detailed expense breakdowns in the provided data, it's challenging to assess spending efficiency beyond the fact that no officer compensation is reported. The organization's small scale and volunteer nature likely mean most funds, when available, are directed towards its mission. The lack of recent financial activity (latest revenue and assets are $0) is a significant concern for its ongoing operational capacity and impact. While the absence of officer compensation is a strength, the overall financial health appears precarious due to its minimal and inconsistent funding.