How Association For Contextualbehavioral Science allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Association For Contextualbehavioral Science
Is Association For Contextualbehavioral Science a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Association For Contextualbehavioral Science (EIN: 205734112) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 1 red flag identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is Association For Contextualbehavioral Science a good charity to donate to?
Association For Contextualbehavioral Science has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $922K. Assets: $2.5M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Association For Contextualbehavioral Science?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Association For Contextualbehavioral Science is 205734112. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Association For Contextualbehavioral Science spend its money?
Association For Contextualbehavioral Science allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Association For Contextualbehavioral Science's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Association For Contextualbehavioral Science's tax-exempt status using EIN 205734112 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Association For Contextualbehavioral Science demonstrates consistent financial health with stable revenue streams, averaging around $900,000 annually over the past decade. The organization maintains a strong asset base, growing from $769,266 in 2014 to $2,462,059 in 2023, significantly exceeding its liabilities which have consistently remained very low (e.g., $3,855 in 2023). This indicates sound financial management and a healthy balance sheet.
Spending efficiency appears to be well-managed, with expenses generally aligning with or slightly below revenue in most years, preventing significant deficits. For instance, in 2023, expenses were $895,043 against revenues of $892,154, showing near break-even operations. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings suggests a volunteer-led or very lean executive structure, which can contribute to higher program spending efficiency. However, without a detailed functional expense breakdown (program, admin, fundraising), a precise assessment of spending efficiency is limited.
In terms of transparency, the organization consistently files its IRS Form 990, with 13 filings available, demonstrating a commitment to public disclosure. The absence of reported officer compensation is a notable transparency point, indicating either a volunteer board or that compensation falls below reporting thresholds, which is positive for a nonprofit of this size. To further enhance transparency, a more detailed breakdown of functional expenses would be beneficial for external analysis.