Is Association Of Assistive Technology Act Programs Legit?
Quick charity verification for Association Of Assistive Technology Act Programs (EIN: 203310936)
Verdict: Association Of Assistive Technology Act Programs appears trustworthy
80/100Mission Score
$936KRevenue
$608KAssets
1Red Flags
4Strengths
Red Flags
Consistent 0% officer compensation, which may obscure how leadership is compensated or sustained for an organization of this size.
Strengths
Consistent financial stability with revenues generally matching or exceeding expenses (e.g., 202408: Revenue $995,868, Expenses $995,320).
Healthy and growing asset base, with assets increasing from $492,738 in 202308 to $542,898 in 202408.
Long history of IRS 990 filings (14 filings), indicating transparency and compliance.
Effective management of liabilities, which have fluctuated but remained manageable relative to assets.
Spending Breakdown
How Association Of Assistive Technology Act Programs allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Association Of Assistive Technology Act Programs
Is Association Of Assistive Technology Act Programs a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Association Of Assistive Technology Act Programs (EIN: 203310936) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 80/100. 1 red flag identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Association Of Assistive Technology Act Programs a good charity to donate to?
Association Of Assistive Technology Act Programs has a Mission Score of 80/100. Revenue: $936K. Assets: $608K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Association Of Assistive Technology Act Programs?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Association Of Assistive Technology Act Programs is 203310936. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Association Of Assistive Technology Act Programs spend its money?
Association Of Assistive Technology Act Programs allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Association Of Assistive Technology Act Programs's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Association Of Assistive Technology Act Programs's tax-exempt status using EIN 203310936 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Association Of Assistive Technology Act Programs demonstrates consistent financial stability with revenues generally matching or exceeding expenses over the past several years. For instance, in the 202408 period, revenue was $995,868 against expenses of $995,320, indicating a balanced budget. The organization maintains a healthy asset base, with assets of $608,028 as of the latest filing, and has shown a positive trend in net assets in recent periods, such as the increase from $492,738 in 202308 to $542,898 in 202408. This suggests prudent financial management and an ability to cover liabilities, which have also been managed effectively.
Regarding spending efficiency, the organization's NTEE code P50 (Public, Society Benefit - Technology) suggests a focus on program delivery. Without detailed expense breakdowns beyond the summary, it's challenging to precisely determine program efficiency. However, the consistent operational balance implies that funds are being utilized for their intended purpose without significant deficits. The absence of reported officer compensation across all filings is a notable aspect of its financial structure, potentially indicating a volunteer-led or externally compensated leadership model, which can contribute to lower administrative overhead.
In terms of transparency, the consistent filing of IRS Form 990s over 14 periods, including detailed financial figures, indicates a commitment to public disclosure. The readily available financial data allows for a clear overview of the organization's financial activities. The lack of reported officer compensation, while potentially efficient, could also raise questions about the compensation structure if key leadership roles are indeed compensated through other means not reflected in this specific line item, which would warrant further investigation for complete transparency.