Is Back To Jerusalem Inc Legit?

Red Flags

Significant increase in liabilities in 2023 ($1,092,000) relative to assets ($527,383 for the same period), indicating potential financial strain.
Frequent periods where expenses exceed revenue (e.g., 2023, 2021, 2019, 2017, 2015), suggesting inconsistent financial management or reliance on reserves.
Volatile asset levels over the years, making it difficult to assess long-term financial planning and stability.

Spending Breakdown

How Back To Jerusalem Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

80%

Program Spending

Healthy — majority goes to mission

15%

Admin Costs

Reasonable — admin costs in check

Fundraising

Within typical range

How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Back To Jerusalem Inc

Is Back To Jerusalem Inc a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Back To Jerusalem Inc (EIN: 201581781) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.

Is Back To Jerusalem Inc a good charity to donate to?

Back To Jerusalem Inc has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $1.4M. Assets: $342K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Back To Jerusalem Inc?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Back To Jerusalem Inc is 201581781. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Back To Jerusalem Inc spend its money?

Back To Jerusalem Inc allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Back To Jerusalem Inc's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Back To Jerusalem Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 201581781 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

Back To Jerusalem Inc. demonstrates a fluctuating financial performance over the past decade. While the organization has reported significant revenues, such as $3,830,259 in 2018 and $2,807,327 in 2016, it has also experienced periods where expenses exceeded revenue, notably in 2023 ($1,603,038 expenses vs. $1,187,346 revenue) and 2021 ($1,751,117 expenses vs. $1,572,378 revenue). This indicates a need for more consistent financial management to ensure long-term sustainability. The organization's assets have also varied considerably, from a low of $118,565 in 2015 to a high of $985,526 in 2020, currently standing at $341,631. This volatility in both revenue/expense balance and asset accumulation suggests potential challenges in maintaining stable operations or building substantial reserves.

The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings is a significant positive indicator for transparency and a focus on mission over executive enrichment. However, without a detailed breakdown of functional expenses (program, administrative, fundraising) in the provided data, it's challenging to fully assess spending efficiency. The presence of liabilities, particularly the substantial $1,092,000 in 2023, warrants closer examination as it represents a significant portion of their assets and could impact financial flexibility. Overall, while the lack of executive compensation is commendable, the financial volatility and recent increase in liabilities suggest areas for improvement in financial stability and detailed spending transparency.

Verdict: Back To Jerusalem Inc appears trustworthy