Quick charity verification for Barnabas Ministries International (EIN: 10739290)
Verdict: Barnabas Ministries International appears trustworthy
70/100Mission Score
$71KRevenue
$37KAssets
3Red Flags
3Strengths
Red Flags
Recurring operational deficits (e.g., $17,281 in 2023, $10,841 in 2022)
Declining asset base in recent years (from $38,739 in 2021 to $10,617 in 2023)
Inconsistent revenue generation, leading to significant deficits in some years (e.g., 2019 revenue of $14,199 against expenses of $57,176)
Strengths
Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation, indicating high efficiency in executive pay.
Long history of IRS 990 filings (13 filings), demonstrating transparency.
Low liabilities reported in most recent years (e.g., $0 in 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020).
Spending Breakdown
How Barnabas Ministries International allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Barnabas Ministries International
Is Barnabas Ministries International a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Barnabas Ministries International (EIN: 10739290) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Barnabas Ministries International a good charity to donate to?
Barnabas Ministries International has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $71K. Assets: $37K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Barnabas Ministries International?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Barnabas Ministries International is 10739290. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Barnabas Ministries International spend its money?
Barnabas Ministries International allocates 85% to programs, 15% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Barnabas Ministries International's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Barnabas Ministries International's tax-exempt status using EIN 10739290 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Barnabas Ministries International demonstrates a consistent operational pattern, with revenues and expenses fluctuating but generally remaining in a similar range over the past decade. For instance, in 2023, the organization reported revenue of $81,002 against expenses of $98,283, indicating a deficit for that year. This trend of expenses exceeding revenue is also visible in 2022 ($124,664 expenses vs. $113,823 revenue) and 2019 ($57,176 expenses vs. $14,199 revenue), suggesting potential reliance on prior year reserves or inconsistent funding. The organization's assets have also shown variability, from a high of $64,004 in 2017 to a low of $10,617 in 2023, which could impact long-term stability if deficits continue.
The organization's financial transparency appears strong, as evidenced by 13 filings and consistent reporting of zero officer compensation across all available periods. This indicates that the organization is not allocating funds to executive salaries, which is a positive sign for donor confidence regarding administrative efficiency. However, the consistent operational deficits in recent years, such as the $17,281 deficit in 2023, warrant closer examination to understand how the organization is covering these shortfalls and maintaining its operations. While the NTEE code X21 (Religious Organizations) often implies a focus on mission, the financial data alone does not provide a detailed breakdown of program versus administrative spending, which would further enhance the assessment of spending efficiency.
Overall, Barnabas Ministries International exhibits a commitment to transparency through its filing history and zero executive compensation. However, the recurring operational deficits and fluctuating asset base suggest a need for improved financial planning or more stable funding sources to ensure long-term sustainability. Without a detailed breakdown of expenses, it's challenging to fully assess spending efficiency, but the lack of officer compensation is a notable positive indicator.