Quick charity verification for Berg Jones & Sarvis (EIN: 10473374)
Verdict: Berg Jones & Sarvis has notable concerns
20/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
2Red Flags
1Strengths
Red Flags
Zero revenue and assets in latest filing, suggesting inactivity
Lack of detailed expense breakdown due to minimal activity
Strengths
No officer compensation reported in any filing
Spending Breakdown
How Berg Jones & Sarvis allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
0%
Program Spending
Concerning — less than half to programs
0%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Berg Jones & Sarvis
Is Berg Jones & Sarvis a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Berg Jones & Sarvis (EIN: 10473374) has notable concerns. Mission Score: 20/100. 2 red flags identified, 1 strength noted.
Is Berg Jones & Sarvis a good charity to donate to?
Berg Jones & Sarvis has a Mission Score of 20/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Berg Jones & Sarvis?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Berg Jones & Sarvis is 10473374. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Berg Jones & Sarvis spend its money?
Berg Jones & Sarvis allocates 0% to programs, 0% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Berg Jones & Sarvis's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Berg Jones & Sarvis's tax-exempt status using EIN 10473374 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Berg Jones & Sarvis appears to be a very small organization, possibly a dormant or newly formed entity, given its latest reported revenue of $0 and assets of $0. The most recent filing with financial activity, from 2012, shows minimal revenue of $209 and no reported expenses, while the 2010 filing shows revenue and expenses both at $2,350. The lack of significant financial activity in recent periods, coupled with zero revenue and assets in the latest available data, suggests it may not be actively operating or has ceased operations. The organization has consistently reported no officer compensation, which is a positive indicator for a small entity, but the overall financial picture is one of minimal to no current activity.
Given the extremely low financial figures and the absence of detailed expense breakdowns, it's challenging to assess spending efficiency or program focus. The organization's transparency is limited by the lack of recent financial activity and detailed operational data. While the filings are available, the information within them points to an organization that is not currently engaged in substantial financial operations, making a robust analysis of its financial health and spending patterns difficult.