Quick charity verification for Bertha W Merselis Up4 (EIN: 166135684)
Verdict: Bertha W Merselis Up4 shows mixed signals
50/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
3Red Flags
1Strengths
Red Flags
Zero revenue and assets, indicating non-operation
Unknown NTEE code
Lack of financial activity makes impact assessment impossible
Strengths
No reported liabilities (implied by zero assets and revenue)
Spending Breakdown
How Bertha W Merselis Up4 allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
0%
Program Spending
Concerning — less than half to programs
0%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Bertha W Merselis Up4
Is Bertha W Merselis Up4 a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Bertha W Merselis Up4 (EIN: 166135684) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 50/100. 3 red flags identified, 1 strength noted.
Is Bertha W Merselis Up4 a good charity to donate to?
Bertha W Merselis Up4 has a Mission Score of 50/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Bertha W Merselis Up4?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Bertha W Merselis Up4 is 166135684. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Bertha W Merselis Up4 spend its money?
Bertha W Merselis Up4 allocates 0% to programs, 0% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Bertha W Merselis Up4's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Bertha W Merselis Up4's tax-exempt status using EIN 166135684 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Bertha W Merselis Up4 appears to be a non-operating entity based on the provided IRS 990 data. With zero reported revenue and zero assets, there is no financial activity to analyze regarding program spending, administrative efficiency, or fundraising efforts. The lack of financial data makes it impossible to assess its financial health or spending efficiency. Furthermore, the unknown NTEE code and absence of financial operations limit the ability to evaluate its transparency beyond the basic filing of a 990, which in this case, indicates no financial transactions.
Given the complete absence of financial activity, it is highly probable that this organization is either newly formed and not yet operational, or it is a dormant entity. Without any revenue or assets, there are no funds being managed or disbursed, meaning there is no impact on beneficiaries or the public to evaluate. Therefore, a meaningful financial analysis regarding its operational effectiveness or impact cannot be conducted from this data.