Maintains a stable, albeit small, asset base with minimal liabilities across all reported periods.
Spending Breakdown
How Bertha W Merselis Ups allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Bertha W Merselis Ups
Is Bertha W Merselis Ups a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Bertha W Merselis Ups (EIN: 166135685) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 40/100. 2 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Bertha W Merselis Ups a good charity to donate to?
Bertha W Merselis Ups has a Mission Score of 40/100. Revenue: $8. Assets: $294. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Bertha W Merselis Ups?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Bertha W Merselis Ups is 166135685. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Bertha W Merselis Ups spend its money?
Bertha W Merselis Ups allocates 80% to programs, 20% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Bertha W Merselis Ups's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Bertha W Merselis Ups's tax-exempt status using EIN 166135685 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Bertha W Merselis Ups appears to be a very small organization with extremely limited financial activity. In its latest filing (201912), the organization reported only $8 in revenue and $20 in expenses, with total assets of $294. This minimal financial scale makes it difficult to conduct a meaningful analysis of spending efficiency or financial health in the traditional sense. The organization consistently reports very low revenue and expenses across all available filings, suggesting it may be largely inactive or serve a very niche, low-cost purpose.
Given the negligible financial figures, assessing spending efficiency ratios like program vs. administrative costs is not practical, as the absolute dollar amounts are too small to be indicative of operational efficiency. The organization consistently reports 0% officer compensation, which is a positive indicator for transparency regarding executive pay, though it's likely due to the organization's small size and potential volunteer-led nature. The consistent reporting of minimal assets and liabilities also points to a very stable, albeit tiny, financial footprint.
Overall, the organization's financial health is stable in that it maintains a small asset base and minimal liabilities, but its operational capacity, as indicated by its revenue and expenses, is extremely limited. Transparency is good in terms of compensation reporting, but the lack of detailed financial activity makes a deeper analysis challenging.