Is Big Hole Watershed Committee Legit? —…

Quick charity verification for Big Hole Watershed Committee (EIN: 113737644)

Spending Breakdown

How Big Hole Watershed Committee allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

85%

Program Spending

Healthy — majority goes to mission

10%

Admin Costs

Reasonable — admin costs in check

Fundraising

Within typical range

How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Big Hole Watershed Committee

Is Big Hole Watershed Committee a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Big Hole Watershed Committee (EIN: 113737644) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 88/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.

Is Big Hole Watershed Committee a good charity to donate to?

Big Hole Watershed Committee has a Mission Score of 88/100. Revenue: $688K. Assets: $131K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Big Hole Watershed Committee?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Big Hole Watershed Committee is 113737644. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Big Hole Watershed Committee spend its money?

Big Hole Watershed Committee allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Big Hole Watershed Committee's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Big Hole Watershed Committee's tax-exempt status using EIN 113737644 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

The Big Hole Watershed Committee demonstrates consistent financial activity, with revenues and expenses generally in a similar range over the past decade, indicating stable operations. For the most recent period (202312), the organization reported revenues of $745,658 against expenses of $760,329, resulting in a slight deficit. This trend of expenses sometimes exceeding revenue is observed in several years (e.g., 202212, 201912, 201512), suggesting a need for careful financial planning to maintain long-term sustainability, although the deficits are not excessively large relative to total expenses.

The organization's assets have fluctuated, reaching a high of $268,655 in 201812 and currently standing at $147,004. Liabilities have also varied, peaking at $90,368 in 202312. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings indicates a strong commitment to directing funds towards programmatic activities rather than executive salaries, which is a positive sign for donor confidence. While specific program spending ratios are not provided in the raw data, the absence of officer compensation suggests a lean administrative structure.

Overall, the Big Hole Watershed Committee appears to be a transparent organization given its consistent 990 filings and clear reporting of no officer compensation. Its financial health, while stable, shows periods of deficit spending that warrant monitoring. The organization's ability to manage these fluctuations while maintaining its mission is key to its continued effectiveness.

Is Big Hole Watershed Committee Legit?

Verdict: Big Hole Watershed Committee appears trustworthy

Red Flags

Strengths